is_array

(PHP 4, PHP 5, PHP 7)

is_array检测变量是否是数组

描述

bool is_array ( mixed $var )

如果 vararray,则返回 TRUE,否则返回 FALSE

参见 is_float()is_int()is_integer()is_string()is_object()

User Contributed Notes

carren at AngieBecker dot ch 27-Sep-2017 05:48
This is probably the best way to test for associative arrays:

<?php
function is_assoc($test) {
        if (empty(
$test)) { return(false); }
        if (!
is_array($test)) { return(false); }
        return (
$test !== array_values($test));
}
?>

This version is based on the one from dmitry dot sushilov, which is unfortunately exactly opposite and misses the is_array and empty test.
http://php.net/manual/en/function.is-array.php#115901
marko at newvibrations dot net 20-Oct-2016 09:08
hperrin at gmail dot com
i tested modified version of your code:

<?php
$test
= array_fill(0, $size, rand());
$test3 = (object) $test;   
?>

Results are quite different!

PHP 5.5:
is_array - execution time is constant over different $size
cast, === - execution time is proportional with $size, for small arrays, it's faster than is_array, but for bigger arrays, it's way slower. Also, bigger memory allocation because casting actually allocates memory

PHP 7.0:
is_array and cast, === have constant execution time over different $size:
is_array  :  0.12564396858215
cast, === :  0.24629783630371

Looks like casting is optimised, but still slower.

Bottom line is: optimisation is not done for special scenario, but for average use and scalability. Don't reinvent wheel.
Rob Thomas 06-Oct-2016 07:40
Please note that the 'cast to array' check is horrendously out of date.

Running that code against PHP 5.6 results in this:

is_array  :  0.93975400924683
cast, === :  1.2425191402435

So, please use 'is_array', not the horrible casting hack.
mt at banita dot de 08-Sep-2016 06:30
I'm using PHP 5.3.10 and the remark from hperrin is not (no longer?) valid

is_array is (now?) faster than if ( (array) $unknown !== $unknown ) 

my result of hperrins test script

is_array  :  0.61710119247437
cast, === :  1.1551909446716
ari at umbrella dot bz 06-Sep-2016 05:34
hperrin's results have indeed changed in PHP 7. The opposite is now true, is_array is faster than comparison:

is_array  :  0.52148389816284
cast, === :  0.84179711341858

Tested 1000000 iterations.
mbrodala at pagemachine dot de 24-Aug-2016 10:22
Notice that the benchmark results from hperrin at gmail dot com have changed in the meantime:

is_array  :  0.31888604164124
cast, === :  0.58448791503906

(Using PHP 5.6.24, I expect other results with PHP 7)
dmitry dot sushilov at gmail dot com 12-Oct-2014 09:49
function is_associate_array($array)
{
    return $array === array_values($array);
}

or you can add check is_array in functions
joksnet at gmail dot com 09-Oct-2013 07:17
Here is something for compare `is_assoc` functions.

<?php
function is_assoc1($var)
{
    return
is_array($var) && array_diff_key($var, array_keys(array_keys($var)));
}

function
is_assoc2($var)
{
    return
is_array($var) && array_diff_key($var, array_fill(0, count($var), null));
}

$count = 1000000;

$a = array('a' => 'foo', 'b' => 1, 'c' => true);
$b = array('a', 'b', 'c');

$i = $start_time = $end_time = 0;

$start_time = microtime(true);
for (
$i = 0; $i < $count; $i++) {
   
assert(is_assoc1($a) === true);
   
assert(is_assoc1($b) === false);
}
$end_time = microtime(true);
echo
'is_assoc1  :  ' . ($end_time - $start_time) . "\n";

$start_time = microtime(true);
for (
$i = 0; $i < $count; $i++) {
   
assert(is_assoc2($a) === true);
   
assert(is_assoc2($b) === false);
}
$end_time = microtime(true);
echo
'is_assoc2  :  ' . ($end_time - $start_time) . "\n";
?>

It prints something like this:

```
% php is_assoc.php
is_assoc1  :  19.36315202713
is_assoc2  :  18.954080104828
```

The first one is from
skaimauve (http://www.php.net/manual/en/function.is-array.php#89332). The second one is mine.
magentix at gmail dot com 26-Feb-2011 06:12
If you wanted to have 'pure' associative arrays,
you could filter out non-string keys and then compare the count of the original array with the count of the filtered array.

<?php
   
// Only validates empty or completely associative arrays
   
function is_assoc ($arr) {
        return (
is_array($arr) && count(array_filter(array_keys($arr),'is_string')) == count($arr));
    }

   
$a = '';
   
$b = 'z';
   
$c = array();
   
$d = array('x','y','z');
   
$e = array('x','y','zed'=>'z');
   
$f = array('ex'=>'x','why'=>'y','zed'=>'z');

    echo
'$a: ' . ( (is_assoc($a)) ? 'true' : 'false' ) ."\n"; // False
   
echo '$b: ' . ( (is_assoc($b)) ? 'true' : 'false' ) ."\n"; // False
   
echo '$c: ' . ( (is_assoc($c)) ? 'true' : 'false' ) ."\n"; // True
   
echo '$d: ' . ( (is_assoc($d)) ? 'true' : 'false' ) ."\n"; // False
   
echo '$e: ' . ( (is_assoc($e)) ? 'true' : 'false' ) ."\n"; // False
   
echo '$f: ' . ( (is_assoc($f)) ? 'true' : 'false' ) ."\n"; // True
?>   

I've tested the point of checking whether the array is empty first.
The overall result was a 200% speed increase when the array was indeed empty,
but an average 10% slow when it had elements inside.

<?php
   
/***********************************************************
     *    Benchmarks: checking for empty array vs. not checking  *
     ***********************************************************/
   
    // With empty check
   
function is_assoc ($arr) {
        return (
is_array($arr) && (!count($arr) || count(array_filter(array_keys($arr),'is_string')) == count($arr)));
    }
   
    function
test_speed($arr) {   
       
$t = microtime(true);
        for(
$i = 0; $i < 100000; ++$i) is_assoc($arr);
        return (
microtime(true) - $t);
    }
   
    echo
'$a: ' . test_speed($a) ."\n"; // 0.20597505569458
   
echo '$b: ' . test_speed($b) ."\n"; // 0.19199514389038
   
echo '$c: ' . test_speed($c) ."\n"; // 0.28803396224976
   
echo '$d: ' . test_speed($d) ."\n"; // 0.94685983657837
   
echo '$e: ' . test_speed($e) ."\n"; // 0.96698403358459
   
echo '$f: ' . test_speed($f) ."\n"; // 0.98052096366882
   
    // Without empty check
   
function is_assoc_2 ($arr) {
        return (
is_array($arr) && count(array_filter(array_keys($arr),'is_string')) == count($arr));
    }
   
    function
test_speed_2($arr) {   
       
$t = microtime(true);
        for(
$i = 0; $i < 100000; ++$i) is_assoc_2($arr);
        return (
microtime(true) - $t);
    }
   
    echo
'$a: ' . test_speed_2($a) ."\n"; // 0.18811202049255 = FASTER:  91.3% of is_assoc
   
echo '$b: ' . test_speed_2($b) ."\n"; // 0.18782901763916 = FASTER:  97.8% of is_assoc
   
echo '$c: ' . test_speed_2($c) ."\n"; // 0.64437484741211 = SLOWER: 223.7% of is_assoc
   
echo '$d: ' . test_speed_2($d) ."\n"; // 0.84632205963135 = FASTER:  89.4% of is_assoc
   
echo '$e: ' . test_speed_2($e) ."\n"; // 0.86739897727966 = FASTER:  89.7% of is_assoc
   
echo '$f: ' . test_speed_2($f) ."\n"; // 0.87963700294495 = FASTER:  89.7% of is_assoc
?>
JTS 08-Jun-2010 01:22
I would change the order of the comparison, because if it is really an empty array, it is better to stop at that point before doing several 'cpu & memory intensive' function calls.

In the end on a ratio of 3 not empty arrays to 1 empty array computed for 1000000 iterations it needed 10% less time.
Or the other way round:
It needed approx 3% to 4% more time if the array is not empty, but was at least 4 times faster on empty arrays.

Additionally the memory consumption veritably lesser.

<?php
function is_assoc($array) {
    return (
is_array($array) && (count($array)==0 || 0 !== count(array_diff_key($array, array_keys(array_keys($array))) )));
}
?>
hperrin at gmail dot com 28-May-2010 07:02
I've found a faster way of determining an array. If you use is_array() millions of times, you will notice a *huge* difference. On my machine, this method takes about 1/4 the time of using is_array().

Cast the value to an array, then check (using ===) if it is identical to the original.

<?php
if ( (array) $unknown !== $unknown ) {
    echo
'$unknown is not an array';
} else {
    echo
'$unknown is an array';
}
?>

You can use this script to test the speed of both methods.

<pre>
What's faster for determining arrays?

<?php

$count
= 1000000;

$test = array('im', 'an', 'array');
$test2 = 'im not an array';
$test3 = (object) array('im' => 'not', 'going' => 'to be', 'an' => 'array');
$test4 = 42;
// Set this now so the first for loop doesn't do the extra work.
$i = $start_time = $end_time = 0;

$start_time = microtime(true);
for (
$i = 0; $i < $count; $i++) {
    if (!
is_array($test) || is_array($test2) || is_array($test3) || is_array($test4)) {
        echo
'error';
        break;
    }
}
$end_time = microtime(true);
echo
'is_array  :  '.($end_time - $start_time)."\n";

$start_time = microtime(true);
for (
$i = 0; $i < $count; $i++) {
    if (!(array)
$test === $test || (array) $test2 === $test2 || (array) $test3 === $test3 || (array) $test4 === $test4) {
        echo
'error';
        break;
    }
}
$end_time = microtime(true);
echo
'cast, === :  '.($end_time - $start_time)."\n";

echo
"\nTested $count iterations."

?>
</pre>

Prints something like:

What's faster for determining arrays?

is_array  :  7.9920151233673
cast, === :  1.8978719711304

Tested 1000000 iterations.
Anonymous 16-May-2009 11:18
Using empty() in the previous example posted by Anonymous will result in a "Fatal error: Can't use function return value in write context".  I suggest using count() instead:

<?php
function is_assoc($array) {
    return (
is_array($array) && 0 !== count(array_diff_key($array, array_keys(array_keys($array)))));
}
?>
skaimauve at yahoo dot ca 03-Mar-2009 09:12
Or you could make use of the array_diff_key and array_key function:

<?php

function is_assoc($var)
{
        return
is_array($var) && array_diff_key($var,array_keys(array_keys($var)));
}

function
test($var)
{
        echo
is_assoc($var) ? "I'm an assoc array.\n" : "I'm not an assoc array.\n";
}

// an assoc array
$a = array("a"=>"aaa","b"=>1,"c"=>true);
test($a);

// an array
$b = array_values($a);
test($b);

// an object
$c = (object)$a;
test($c);

// other types
test($a->a);
test($a->b);
test($a->c);

?>

The above code outputs:
I'm an assoc array.
I'm not an assoc array.
I'm not an assoc array.
I'm not an assoc array.
I'm not an assoc array.
I'm not an assoc array.
Matthias Loitsch 03-Dec-2008 08:36
Or you could make use of the array_diff_key and range functions:

<?php

function isVector($var) { return count(array_diff_key($var, range(0, count($var) - 1))) == 0; }

function
isAssociative($var) { return !isVector($var); }

?>
jim at akubo dot net 28-Oct-2008 08:02
yousef's example was wrong because is_vector returned true instead of false if the key was found
here is the fixed version (only 2 lines differ)
<?php
function is_vector( &$array ) {
   if ( !
is_array($array) || empty($array) ) {
      return -
1;
   }
  
$next = 0;
   foreach (
$array as $k => $v ) {
      if (
$k !== $next ) return false;
     
$next++;
   }
   return
true;
}
?>
yousuf at philipz dot com 17-Oct-2008 12:41
alex frase's example is fast but elanthis at awesomeplay dot com's example is faster and Ilgar's modification of alex's code is faulty (the part " || $_array[$k] !== $v"). Also, Ilgar's suggestion of giving a false return value when the variable isnt an array is not suitable in my opinion and i think checking if the array is empty would also be a suitable check before the rest of the code runs.

So here's the modified (is_vector) version

<?php
function is_vector( &$array ) {
   if ( !
is_array($array) || empty($array) ) {
      return -
1;
   }
  
$next = 0;
   foreach (
$array as $k => $v ) {
      if (
$k !== $next ) return true;
     
$next++;
   }
   return
false;
}
?>

and the modified (alex's is_assoc) version

<?php
function is_assoc($_array) {
    if ( !
is_array($_array) || empty($array) ) {
        return -
1;
    }
    foreach (
array_keys($_array) as $k => $v) {
        if (
$k !== $v) {
            return
true;
        }
    }
    return
false;
}
?>
alex frase 16-Jul-2008 05:05
Yet another simpler, faster is_assoc():

<?php
function is_assoc($array) {
  foreach (
array_keys($array) as $k => $v) {
    if (
$k !== $v)
      return
true;
  }
  return
false;
}
?>

In my tests it runs about twice as fast as Michael/Gabriel's array_reduce() method.

(Speaking of which: Gabriel's version doesn't work as written; it reports associative arrays as numeric if only the first key is non-numeric, or if the keys are numeric but ordered backwards.  Michael solves this problem by comparing array_reduce() to count(), but that costs another function call; it also works to just compare to -1 instead of 0, and therefore return -1 as the ternary else from the callback).
Michael 11-Sep-2007 09:37
A slight modification of what's below:

<?php

function is_assoc($array)
{
    return
is_array($array) && count($array) !== array_reduce(array_keys($array), 'is_assoc_callback', 0);
}

function
is_assoc_callback($a, $b)
{
    return
$a === $b ? $a + 1 : 0;
}

?>
gabriel at bumpt dot nothing-here dot net 29-Aug-2007 05:34
Yet another safer, faster way of detecting whether an array is associative.

The principle is: using array reduction on the keys, we verify that each key is numeric and is equal to its rank.

Beware: integer keys that are not in sequence, or are negative, or with "holes", still make an associative array.

<?php
/**
  * @param array $arr
  * @returns boolean
  */
function isNotAssocArray($arr)
{
    return (
0 !== array_reduce(
       
array_keys($arr),
       
create_function('$a, $b', 'return ($b === $a ? $a + 1 : 0);'),
       
0
       
)
    );
}
?>

Of course, it is still faster if the callback for array_reduce is not an anonymous function:

<?php
function callbackReduceNotArray($a, $b)
{
    return (
$b === $a ? $a + 1 : 0);
}
function
isVector($arr)
{
    return (
0 !== array_reduce(
       
array_keys($arr),
       
'callbackReduceNotArray',
       
0
       
)
    );
}
?>
Alfred J Fazio <alfred dot fazio at gmail dot com> 05-Apr-2007 01:32
Yet another associative array test:

<?php
function binary_nand ($a, $b) { return !$a && !$b; }
function
binary_nor ($a, $b)  { return !$a || !$b; }

// Returns true if array has elements with non-numeric keys
function is_associative_array ($arr) {
  return
is_array($arr) && !empty($arr) && array_reduce(array_map("is_numeric", array_keys($arr)), "binary_nor", true);
}

// Returns true if all elements of array have a non-numeric key
function is_strict_associative_array ($arr) {
  return
is_array($arr) && !empty($arr) && array_reduce(array_map("is_numeric", array_keys($arr)), "binary_nand", false);
}
?>
angelo [at] mandato <dot> com 26-Feb-2007 10:32
The is_associative_array() and is_sequential_array() functions posted by 'rjg4013 at rit dot edu' are not accurate.

The functions fail to recognize indexes that are not in sequence or in order.  For example, array(0=>'a', 2=>'b', 1=>'c') and array(0=>'a', 3=>'b', 5=>'c') would be considered as sequential arrays. A true sequential array would be in consecutive order with no gaps in the indices.

The following solution utilizes the array_merge properties. If only one array is given and the array is numerically indexed, the keys get re-indexed in a continuous way.  The result must match the array passed to it in order to truly be a numerically indexed (sequential) array.  Otherwise it can be assumed to be an associative array (something unobtainable in languages such as C).

The following functions will work for PHP >= 4.

<?php
   
function is_sequential_array($var)
    {
        return (
array_merge($var) === $var && is_numeric( implode( array_keys( $var ) ) ) );
    }
   
    function
is_assoc_array($var)
    {
        return (
array_merge($var) !== $var || !is_numeric( implode( array_keys( $var ) ) ) );
    }
?>

If you are not concerned about the actual order of the indices, you can change the comparison to == and != respectively.
jupiter at nospam dot com 30-May-2006 08:42
Will check a Multi-Dimentional Array to any specified level.  This is a fix to 11/16/05 submission, which would break since you must supply a foreach with an array. Beware recursive functions shouldn't go over 100 deep or could break the memory stack on server.

<?php
// checks for multiarray to defined depth level recursively
// original $level must be 2 or more, else will instantly return true
function isDeepMultiArray($multiarray, $level = 2) {  // default is simple multiarray
   
if (is_array($multiarray)) {  // confirms array
       
if ($level == 1) {  // $level reaches 1 after specified # of recursions 
           
return true// returns true to recursive function conditional
       
// end conditional
       
foreach ($multiarray as $array) {  // goes one level deeper into array
           
if (isDeepMultiArray($array, $level - 1)) {  // check subarray
               
$message = "I'm a multiarray"// optional message
               
return $message// best if $message = true so function returns boolean
           
// end recursive function
       
// end loop
   
} else {  // not an array at specified level
   
return false// is also used recursively so can't change to message
   
}
}

if (
isDeepMultiArray(array(array()), 2)); // beware this returns true eventhough arrays are empty

?>
BTW my notation is consistent with the PEAR manual on coding standards, which is what php.net says to follow. I hope a function like this gets included in PHP6.
jupiter at nospam dot com 30-May-2006 06:15
Simple check for a Multi-Dimentional Array of any depth
<?php
// checks for multiarray (2 or more levels deep)
function isMultiArray($multiarray) {
  if (
is_array($multiarray)) {  // confirms array
   
foreach ($multiarray as $array) {  // goes one level deeper
     
if (is_array($array)) {  // is subarray an array
       
return true// return will stop function
     
// end 2nd check
   
// end loop
 
// end 1st check
 
return false// not a multiarray if this far
}
?>
March 30-Mar-2006 03:28
And here is another variation for a function to test if an array is associative. Based on the idea by mot4h.

<?php
function is_associative($array)
{
  if (!
is_array($array) || empty($array))
    return
false;

 
$keys = array_keys($array);
  return
array_keys($keys) !== $keys;
}
?>
dan at cain dot sh 11-Dec-2004 02:05
is_array() under PHP 5.0.2 will return FALSE when passed an object descended from the internal class interface ArrayAccess(http://www.php.net/spl) even though said object behaves as an array would in most instances.

I've found the following user function helpful with my own classes and functions that expect array(s) as arguments, but work fine with objects that behave as an array would.

<?php
function is_array_abled(&$x)
{
    return (bool)(
$x instanceof ArrayAccess or is_array($x));
}
?>
vhermecz at ixpert dot hu 02-Apr-2004 01:58
Mike's function is quite cool, it is just the one, I was searching for. Using range is a great idea! But it's a bit long for me. Here is a shorter version:

<?php
function is_assoc_array($var) {
    if (!
is_array($var)) {
        return
false;
    }
    return
array_keys($var)!==range(0,sizeof($var)-1);
}
?>

Or, if you don't want to type that much:

<?php
function is_assoc($var) {
    return
is_array($var) && array_keys($var)!==range(0,sizeof($var)-1);
}
?>