Here's a simple plug-and-play replacement to imagecopyresampled that will deliver results that are almost identical except MUCH faster (very typically 30 times faster). I've been using this function for a few years but figured everyone could benefit from it.
For example, a 10 megapixel camera image (3872x2592 resolution) converted to thumbnail size using the default quality is 60 times faster than using imagecopyresampled (only 0.15 seconds from 8.9 seconds) and the image quality is almost identical. There's also an optional "quality" parameter that allows you to select the quality you want (1 is lowest quality but fastest, 5 is highest quality but slowest, 3 is default). All existing imagecopyresampled parameters fully work so it's truly plug-and-play. It also automatically decides if it would be better to just use imagecopyresampled depending on source and destination image sizes.
My image analysis shows imagecopyresized renders on average 2.4% of pixels significantly different than imagecopyresampled. These significantly different pixels give imagecopyresized the jagged, blocky, aliasing look. Using fastimagecopyresampled with a quality of 2, the significantly different pixel rate is reduced to 0.8%. With a quality of 3 (the default) it's reduced to 0.5% and at a quality of 4 it's reduced to only 0.03% but is still very typically 10-15 times faster for thumbnail creation.
Enjoy!
<?
function fastimagecopyresampled (&$dst_image, $src_image, $dst_x, $dst_y, $src_x, $src_y, $dst_w, $dst_h, $src_w, $src_h, $quality = 3) {
// Plug-and-Play fastimagecopyresampled function replaces much slower imagecopyresampled.
// Just include this function and change all "imagecopyresampled" references to "fastimagecopyresampled".
// Typically from 30 to 60 times faster when reducing high resolution images down to thumbnail size using the default quality setting.
// Author: Tim Eckel - Date: 12/17/04 - Project: FreeRingers.net - Freely distributable.
//
// Optional "quality" parameter (defaults is 3). Fractional values are allowed, for example 1.5.
// 1 = Up to 600 times faster. Poor results, just uses imagecopyresized but removes black edges.
// 2 = Up to 95 times faster. Images may appear too sharp, some people may prefer it.
// 3 = Up to 60 times faster. Will give high quality smooth results very close to imagecopyresampled.
// 4 = Up to 25 times faster. Almost identical to imagecopyresampled for most images.
// 5 = No speedup. Just uses imagecopyresampled, highest quality but no advantage over imagecopyresampled.
if (empty($src_image) || empty($dst_image)) { return false; }
if ($quality <= 1) {
$temp = imagecreatetruecolor ($dst_w + 1, $dst_h + 1);
imagecopyresized ($temp, $src_image, $dst_x, $dst_y, $src_x, $src_y, $dst_w + 1, $dst_h + 1, $src_w, $src_h);
imagecopyresized ($dst_image, $temp, 0, 0, 0, 0, $dst_w, $dst_h, $dst_w, $dst_h);
imagedestroy ($temp);
} elseif ($quality < 5 && (($dst_w * $quality) < $src_w || ($dst_h * $quality) < $src_h)) {
$tmp_w = $dst_w * $quality;
$tmp_h = $dst_h * $quality;
$temp = imagecreatetruecolor ($tmp_w + 1, $tmp_h + 1);
imagecopyresized ($temp, $src_image, $dst_x * $quality, $dst_y * $quality, $src_x, $src_y, $tmp_w + 1, $tmp_h + 1, $src_w, $src_h);
imagecopyresampled ($dst_image, $temp, 0, 0, 0, 0, $dst_w, $dst_h, $tmp_w, $tmp_h);
imagedestroy ($temp);
} else {
imagecopyresampled ($dst_image, $src_image, $dst_x, $dst_y, $src_x, $src_y, $dst_w, $dst_h, $src_w, $src_h);
}
return true;
}
?>